Where to invest DANGEROUS? - News about real estate, Kiev, Kyiv region. Real Estate In Ukraine
The Ukrainian real estate market is in a fever: the decline in the construction industry over the last six months was 4%. The rate of growth of investment in housing construction in...To invest in Kyiv construction has become dangerousThe Ukrainian real estate market is in a fever: the decline in the construction industry over the last six months was 4%. The rate of growth of volume of investments in housing construction in Kiev has decreased by eight times. Such information during the press-conference in UNIAN published Natallia Dziuba, Director General of the Bureau of construction technologies.Among the main reasons for the expert calls the rise of the mortgage, the credit crunch and a significant increase in the price of building materials. Profit developers and intermediary companies are reduced, and some of them try to translate financial burden on the shoulders of private investors. The result: almost every week at the capital's real estate market there is a new building Scam.Today hunters of easy money are construction firms and construction companies, and the court in such a situation is often not on the side of ordinary citizens.The most common scheme is a Scam investment treaties, says Vladimir Kostylev, lawyer of the investor, which in 2005 was invested in the construction of apartments at the address of Leo Tolstoy, 35-39. Object delivery was delayed for over one and a half years. And intermediary company ZAO TD "Interservice" informed the investor that the technical parameters of the apartment changed. And now he will have to pay for it any more under the conditions noted in the investment agreement, and solely for certain intermediary price, which is almost three times larger than the previous one. Goloseevsky regional court of Kiev in the face of a judge Yulia Ivanenko has resolved the case in favor of ZAO TD "Interservice".The lawyer is convinced that in this case there is a speech about the incomplete ascertainment by the court of the circumstances of the case and the proved circumstances that the court considers established. And the assumption by the court of first instance of violation of substantive law.